In a former life, castrating and branding the young bulls
was spring-time ritual. The smell of
singed hair & flesh is memorable. In
another former life, I had a million dollar spread on Farm Town that I turned
into a sub-division. In my current life,
I don’t own a cell phone, an iPad or an e-Reader.
Yesterday, I received an e-mail from Klout that my “influence”
has declined in the past 30 days by 2 points.
Klout also informed me that I seem to have some expertise in “anxiety.” I reacted to this information as I have to
the 401K statements I’ve received over the past few years…with mild amusement. It’s always been a tiny, supplemental
account; I would have been better off to invest the money in a piggy bank.
In January, I deactivated my Facebook account for a variety
of reasons. One was that the Missouri
legislature was attempting to outlaw Facebook relationships between students
and teachers. My college at the time did
not have a social media policy, but I was assured that this state policy would
not apply to college instructors. Mostly
though, I did not want Facebook to “go public” with “my privacy.” It was Klout suicide—my score dropped 20
points. It might have been different had
I had the foresight to set up different accounts for my professional life, my
family life, and my blogging life. Nevertheless,
it has taken some of my “friends” months to realize that I’m no longer there.
I have a Tumblr account that I update erratically (it’s full
of experimental looks and funny outtakes from my photo sessions). I have maintained my Twitter account. I don’t offer much there and I’m not very
good at promoting my friends’ blogs, but I like to think that I’m a thoughtful
curator of articles related to topics that I’m interested in.
I joined Pinterest months before it fully caught on. Initially, I thought I would use it primarily
as a “wish list” of things I admired, but could not afford. But, as it’s turned out, I pin mostly recipes
of healthy dishes I’d like to try, cleaning tips using green materials I
already have on hand, and DIY projects I’ll try when my grandson grows bored
with his summer vacation.
I’ve mostly experimented with social media as a way to have
some awareness of my students’ sensibilities.
In short, I do not use any form of social media to promote myself as a “brand.”
In the two years I’ve been blogging at Rags, I’ve come
across so many articles on SEO and building one’s brand. These things are on my mind because of an excellent
article I read at n+1 magazine, which thoughtfully examined the
intersection of fast fashion, Facebook, and branding. These excerpts are Rob Horning's words, with my emphasis:
“Much as fast-fashion companies are routinely accused of pirating designs, Facebook continually oversteps once sacrosanct norms of privacy, opting users in to data-divulging mechanisms by default and backpedaling only when confronted with public outcry. It offers a space akin to the fast-fashion retailer’s changing room for the ritual staging of the self, inviting users to seize upon ‘stylistic elements’ from wherever they can be grabbed. We become involuntary bricoleurs, scrambling to cobble together an ad hoc identity from whatever memes happen to be relevant at the time.”
“The personal brand, in its concatenation of fame hunger and dismal self-exploitation, is the evolutionary end point of a tendency implicit in fashion since the rise of consumerism. As fashion strayed from its pre-capitalist role of expressing established hierarchies, it helped usher in a reflexive sense of self, set in terms of constantly shifting social meanings. It reconciled people to the idea of an identity not foisted upon us by birth and circumstances, but one for which we must hold ourselves personally responsible….fashion has been a form of institutionalized insecurity.”
“We need a sympathetic community within which to realize our individuality. Social media tends to turn that effort to preserve that community into the pursuit of fame. And when we pursue fame, our behavior devolves into the familiar forms of self-commodification. We replace the pleasure of what we do with fantasies about the measurable notoriety we imagine we’ll reap.”
I’ve been paranoid about my online presence since 9/11, not out
of anything I have to hide, but out of concern for my privacy. I recognize the value of carefully guarding
one’s online presence and I do actively protect my reputation as an
educator. But, I also do random searches
on esoteric subjects to deliberately toy with advertising algorithms. My internet signal is shared with 12 other
adults who share the building in which I live—one is training to be a minister,
one is disabled, two are gamers, another is a young mother, and my husband is
forever doing searches on “antique organs.”
I can only imagine the search profile for my ISP.
I want to believe that my failure to fit into ANY neat “marketing”
demographic is a bid for authenticity.
And little by little, I’ve come to believe that bloggers of a certain
age know something about authenticity that younger users of social media may
never have known.
Now, I’m curious to know about the various ways my readers
might use social media and if you ever think of yourself as a brand. And, is authenticity possible in the world of social media?
sometimes when I call things ___ "go round" I feel like I have a brand. Or my column, with its title, feels like a brand sometimes. But I don't think it has reached inauthenticity yet :)
ReplyDeleteMeri--"go round" tells me that you are well-rounded and interested in many things. I read your blog primarily for your travel pieces and for bits about your writing. I would have to say that yours IS an authentic blog.
DeleteThis is interesting Terri. I enjoyed the writings of Rob Horning. Especially when he said, "And when we pursue fame, our behavior devolves into the familiar forms of self-commodification. We replace the pleasure of what we do with fantasies about the measurable notoriety we imagine we’ll reap.”
ReplyDeleteI deleted my Facebook account recently too because I worry about lack of privacy in some ways. But did you know that even though we delete our Facebook accounts our information really is still there?
Currently I'm bothered by my yahoo mail account sending enormous ads after I've sent e-mails out. Many of them are flashing and super bright. I just have to laugh though when the ads down the sides of pages show shoe stores. LOL Gee, I wonder what I've been up to. ;)
Joni--That makes three of us that have deleted our FBs. And, yes, I know that ALL of my information could be data-mined, even my credit card purchases. Little by little, I've begun to do more business in cash.
DeleteSometimes, my ads are spot on, but frequently they are for senior citizen products. I'm not quite fully there yet.
Terri - very thought provoking, and hilarious the playing with the search algorithms!
ReplyDeleteI do use all types of social media, but for different things:
- FB is for people I actually know: friends, family, people from work or school.
- Twitter I use more for news and trending topics than for tweeting.
- Blogging I use as a diary of sorts; before blogging, I would write down what I wore each day in the corner of my agenda. Sort of a George V thing.
- Pinterest just does not work for me: It doesn't matter what browser I use, I can't pin my own stuff! Back to Polyvore.
As for authenticity, perhaps I'm a bit naive, but I generally assume everyone is showing their true self online so yes: it is possible.
Narda--Your approach to social media sounds so SANE. In retrospect, I wish I had limited Facebook to family. I initially used Twitter to follow breaking news only...and then gradually that changed. I keep a handwritten journal, which is very different than my blog. I think I use the journal to work out thoughts and feelings I don't always understand immediately. Polyvore is one bit of social media that I have not explored...and probably shouldn't get started!
DeleteI rarely use facebook any more and do tweet (from my computer), but I'd hate to think of myself as a 'brand'. I am a human, a person who has a lot to share if anyone want to join me, it's terrific. I suppose blogging is (for me) a way to share my creativity and find like-minded pals to help me in my mid-life journey. I just got rid of a brand widget because, honestly, their merchandise is way too expensive and that's not what I'm about. I hope I can remain true to myself in that way.
ReplyDeleteI read from a 'big-timer' how important Klout is, but so far, it hasn't proven to be much for me and my score is growing...
So, a novella later, I hope authenticity still exists here in Blogdonia!
big hugs and thanks for always making me think big thoughts!
Reva
Reva--I know you have a lot to share and I have joined you. I hope I'm a measurable part of that growing Klout score, but I think from here on, I'm going to mark those Klout e-mails I get as "spam". And, yes, I think authenticity does exist in Blogdonia. I know I've come across posts that have made me cry and others that have made me laugh out loud and others that have made me whoop with joy for the blogger.
DeleteI've thought a lot about authenticity and online presence. My goal is to always be my authentic self — which to me means operating and sharing based on my ethics and values. Being authentic does not mean I have to share everything about myself online though. I can be selective about what I choose to put online, as long as I'm not lying about the other part of my life that I do not share.
ReplyDeleteI think I have a different response to the idea of branding myself. A brand expresses a particular identity, and as long as "my brand" expresses my ethics and values, I am comfortable using that term. As a fashion historian and museum professional I need to promote my knowledge and skills. As a blogger I need to promote my writing and expertise. Using the idea of a brand to promote those things does not bother me.
I also realize that "my brand" does not have to represent all facets of my life to be authentic. I think of "my brand" as my public face. My personal one that my family and friends see doesn't need to be part of "my brand" to maintain authenticity.
Jacqueline--I like how you are thinking about this in terms of "ethics and values" and making a distinction between what belongs online and what doesn't. You have done a good job of it...to have the HuffPo ask your opinion on the "The Great Gatsby" costumes. You're recognized for what you are.
DeleteYour third paragraph touches on what troubles me about "branding"--as a brand seems smaller than what a person is. T.S. Eliot "prepare a face to meet a face". Branding, to my way of thinking, reduces relations to economics. And our world is in dire need of recognizing that all of us are more than consumers or employees or entrepreneurs or CEOs.
I love the way you articulated this. I have had a considerable online presence for well over a decade now, but over the past year I've actually taken the steps to turn my online presence into something more cohesive and unified. The process of doing this has caused me a lot of anxiety as I am resistant to the idea of turning myself, my beliefs and my opinions into a commodity, even though I'd like to someday make money off the work I do online. So I really like the demarcation you've put in place, and I will probably incorporate your ideas into my own philosophy. Thanks. :)
DeleteCaitlin--I'm glad I could be of some help.
DeleteI'm definitely preoccupied with autheticity, as I've written before. I have an uneasy relationship with social media. I wouldn't get rid of my facebook at this point, mainly because my life style makes it good for casually keeping in touch with people far away, but I really question the use both of social media and personal branding. I'm mainly just relieved to be old enough that I didn't have to grow up online. As much as having started my blog in 2007 might have aided my "personal brand," starting it in 2003, say, would have created a lot of embarrassing copy!
ReplyDeleteEmily--In my mind you have a stable brand/character/style/personality. Part of the problem here may simply be a semantic one. I suspect that the word "brand" may be very, very similar to what was meant by "style" (of manners, writing, clothing, character) in a previous generation. Like you, I'm glad that no photos exist of that wet t-shirt contest I won one drunken evening.
DeleteI don't have Facebook or Twitter or any of those other things. I put up a blog and then took it down, put it up again and then took it down, fearful of divulging anything about myself, but at the same time looking for a community of like-minded people, which is so difficult and time-consuming to do in 3D life.
ReplyDeleteThere is a temptation to "sell" my street style blog especially, in the sense of trying to make it a commercial venture, but when I focus on numbers and posting frequency, I start to feel pressure and lose some of the joy.
I'm still conflicted. I think most people enjoy validation, but how much is enough? And does it mean anything when it's so easy to play the numbers game online?
Melanie--You're "branded" in my mind as highly creative and funny in both of your blogs. I agree that there is a slight loss of joy in making a routine of blog or in working with advertisers. I remain conflicted, but this discussion and the comments have helped me articulate what it is that troubles me about being approached by advertisers.
DeleteI think I tried to manage my 'brand' when I was at work, though I didn't think of it in those terms. And to some extent, in trying to keep promises, be courteous, etc., I still do. When I blog it's mainly for my own pleasure in writing, in part as a way of sharing my life with family and old friends in the States, but it has the added benefit of acquainting me with new friends (such as yourself). I try not to come across as too ignorant, too self-absorbed, too boring...so in that I am sort of managing my brand. I just think of it as doing my best not to embarrass myself. It would never occur to me to look at something like Klout; it all seems quite manufactured and what is the point of collecing information if it's not going to change your behaviour? I think at the point that you do that (use info to change) you are definintely managing your brand.
ReplyDeleteI have a FB account, because my uncle puts a lot on there and a few other relatives I want to keep up with like Bill's children. I am sometimes aghast at what they reveal. Simon recently shut down his FB account. He says because it was becoming obsessive for him, but I suspect his employer may have had a view and rightly so. I put very little on, the occasional amusing thing, almost never anything personal. I've not ever had the desire to tweet, tumble or pin. Between email and blogging I already have more screen time than is probably good for me. Actually, pinterest sounds wonderful, but then I'd have no life at all!
I am concerned about privacy on the internet. I try to keep my anonymity in the blog, though I'm sure a determined person with a bit of local knowledge could crack it. I'm not rich or famous (thank goodness) enough for anyone to take notice. I hope to remain so. What the advertising industry does, I'm not quite as concerned about. So far, they can't MAKE me buy the things they wave in front of me.
I can only imagine what the data dredgers do with all the searches that go on in your house! What a hoot!
That part about community, fame and self-commodification? This calls to mind the old thing about the difference between character and reputation, reputation being what others think of you and character being how you really are. Sometime during Tony Blair's term (I liked him, don't get me wrong) the phrase 'being seen to' do something became part of political speak. It's always reminded me of people who pray more fervently when they know they are observed... I think it is important that people see their government take action, but having grown up in the Bible belt I do have other connotations for the phrase.
I think community is about character and it's about giving as much or more than taking. All that other stuff - brand, reputation, influence, fame? That's about wanting someone to give you something - usually leading eventually to money.
Finally, I keep thinking there is an age-related issue here. I read that teens these days use gadgets for community instead of face to fact time (possible owing to cost of cars and gas). I'm still of an age that my primary source of community is face to face, in part because of walking and public transport (and using those most of the time makes it possible to run a car for longer journeys). I know not everyone has this luxury of walking, but I think most middle aged people still prefer F2F to gadgetry. Also, the thirst for fame / notoriety seems to me quite a childish thing, appealing to people who haven't learned the beauty of a quiet life or who still dream of making their fabulous fortune... Sorry for droning on so long.
Shelley--I probably could have done a better job of "branding" in the workplace. I suspect I'm thought of as a creative cantankerous faculty member who shall never be more than that because I don't guard my tongue well enough.
DeleteI had thought I could get rid of Klout by unfollowing on Twitter and deactivating FB. I need to mark any further e-mails from them as spam. My screen time is very intense between teaching so many classes online and maintaining Rags. I could stand to let loose of the social media.
As for managing one's image in politics, I have long assumed that is standard operating procedure and have gradually tuned much of it out. I like how you characterize "character" and you have certainly given me plenty to think about with your comment.
I know that my transition to writing online was a rocky one...and I like to flatter myself that I've kept up, but just watching my daughters and step-children text and phone, I recognize the chasm between the generations.
Terri, WOW! What a thoughtful post. I've actually been kind of stuck on this since I started blogging. I just assumed that style blogs were people like me who just enjoyed clothes and how they wore them. I had no idea that so many of them had become brands and then it seemed that that was the goal of the mainstream fashion blogging community. Two of my favorite Horning quotes: "... fashion has been a form of institutionalized insecurity." (That's a packed statement right there!!) and "And when we pursue fame, our behavior devolves into the familiar forms of self-commodification. We replace the pleasure of what we do with fantasies about the measurable notoriety we imagine we’ll reap." (Embarrassingly true....)
ReplyDeleteRegarding social media, I'm apathetic toward so much of it and actually hostile to a small part of it! I deleted my FB account because I really didn't think it brought out the best in me. I found myself knowing too much about some people and forming opinions that I didn't want to form. I enjoy Twitter (especially yours!) and I'm really enjoying the pictorial interaction of Instagram. I'm beyond bored and turned off by the relentless "follow me" and "Like me". I've found myself a number of times being pulled in this direction and being stressed over my Klout score. I just don't even want to get into that mess! I don't want to have 12 social media outlets to keep up with. It gets to the point where one spends more time promoting themselves than actual quality content worthy of promotion. It seems like the way it should work is that if we put good content out there and get to know our fellow bloggers, we'll end up promoting each other NOT ourselves. (Not that I've mastered ANY of this!)
As far as brand and authenticity? Elegant Bohemian, I guess, is my brand. I sell, write and style under that moniker. For me, it's a philosophy, a way of living. I've absolutely strayed from authenticity in a bid to seem more interesting, to get more readers, to get noticed. I did exactly what Horning mentioned, took something that I love and got caught up in perceived benefits to the point that I didn't enjoy it any more. I've had to take a step back and restart. And now I'm doing my very best to be as authentic as possible in EVERY area of my life. It's not always interesting or noteworthy; but it's me. Thank you so much for such a great post!!! Big honkin' hug to you my friend! ~Serene
Serene--I suspect that many beginning bloggers secretly harbor the delusions of grandeur. I know the Forbes mention didn't help me any in that sense. I had not known you had deleted your FB...like you I learned too much about former students that I kept in touch with thinking I might be called upon to write reference letters one day. I need to learn to leave some social media behind. LinkedIn for example hasn't been a problem, in part because I have two identities there and they've somehow become hosed up over a confusion with my e-mail addresses. I'll keep it that way. I think there are some blogs that are entirely self-promotion. You strip that away and there is NOTHING left of value for a reader.
DeleteI think of you as an authentic person, even knowing the re-evaluations you've done periodically. I know that you do have a brand/business, but it seems perfectly in line with the person I've grown to know at The Elegant Bohemian. I don't think selling has to mean inauthenticity.
What an interesting post. Unfortunately I do have to think of myself as a type of brand, because most of what I do on social media is linked back to my business. That said, I don't even look at things like Klout because I don't want that kind of pressure - I might use these things to promote my business, but I also want it to be enjoyable and something that reflects me. As soon as I start worrying about scores, that kills it for me.
ReplyDeletePennyDreadful--You are an interesting case in my mind. You do have an active business affiliated with your blog...and yet I don't mind somehow. Perhaps, I see value in taking a gander at the merchandise whether I buy or not. I learn something from it.
DeleteLike Serene, I am apathetic to most forms of social media, but I hate to think it's only because of my age (56). I don't want to be a Luddite, and in fact I enjoy computing enormously. I have a Facebook account I rarely use, ditto with Pinterest.
ReplyDeleteAs to branding, I haven't thought about my blog that way, although I recognize I reach out to a certain segment of the population. I try to remain who I am, and speak as if I am talking to a friend, not a "customer".
Much to contemplate here - thank you.
Patti--you and Serene need to help me be more apathetic about it! You are far from a Luddite--helping me with the InLinkz thing when I needed the advice.
DeleteI don't think we can help relating to others like ourselves, but I am personally always pushing the boundaries on that. I want my relationship to be as a friend...because basically, I have nothing to sell. I think that though, and I find that there are plenty of advertisers who would like to "make use" of my circle of friends.
Terri, I read your post and then drove to school thinking about it before I replied. I have struggled with all of these topics. I told you recently that I currently view my blog as an online resume because I need to supplement my income or find something else. Because of that, I guess I do look at it as branding over50feeling40, and I tend to be perhaps too open and honest on the blog. I mostly see over50feeling40 as an attitude and a way to help other women...I started with that in mind and it remains my number one mission. Even though I am attempting to market my brand, I am AWFUL at most social media because of time. As a high school teacher, a freelance writer, and a blogger, I have so little time to really work facebook, twitter, pinterest, etc. the way they should be worked for marketing success. Also, it is so hard for teachers to be on Facebook...even if we try everything to just use it to promote the blogs. I do not want to use it to keep up with current or past students...I love them...I just want a segment of my life to be mine and private. I did not register for KLOUT because I did not need another place telling me I do it wrong! Its like the popular kids at school...I just can't measure up...and that is not why I am here! :) One of my goals this summer is to attempt to redesign my FaceBook page so that it is obvious it is for the blog and not me. But whenever, I go there I get frustrated. I will continue to promote my writing and my work through over50feeling40, but first and foremost it is for my audience and the dear friends I have met over cyberspace. I think if I looked at it for marketing alone...I would have stopped by now! Excellent thought provoking conversation...throw the KLOUT comments out the window...you have much KLOUT with the ladies who read and enjoy your work!!
ReplyDeletePam--I completely understand your desire to build Over50feeling40 into a place that does build up women. You've accomplished that in spades...and it is the primary characteristic of your blog, whether you think of it as a "brand" or not. I think in a previous generation we might have used the word "character" or "style" in the broader sense to describe "what we think of when a certain name/blog comes to mind".
DeleteI'm basically fairly clumsy at most social media simply because I don't have the tools--I can't tweet any live television because I don't have a cell phone or a television! In that sense I'm a throwback. And you're right that there are plenty of outlets that make us feel we're doing it wrong.
I've watched your blog blossom and grow. You've built it organically and I admire the community you've built there.
Terrific post. I used to worry about my "Klout" but now I am not really concerned. I signed up for Twitter year's ago but I have never really used it. I have a facebook account for personal use and my blog posts feed to it but that is it. I think I am still trying to find my niche in the cyber world and am more concerned with being authentically me than selling a brand idea.
ReplyDeleteJulie
Julie--perhaps that "letting go" of control has been good in multiple ways! Keep your focus on authenticity.
DeleteI don't even have FB...When my husband was "Director of Undergraduate Studies" (ugh--he hated it), the provost told him to get a FB account to communicate with students. Shortly thereafter, he was told NOT to use it w/ students. The provost realized that FB was out of university control.
ReplyDeleteSo he still has the FB acct, but only one friend, our daughter, who keeps threatening to unfriend us.
Frugal--I suspect that social media changes so swiftly that college policy often cannot keep up. I sat on the committee that ultimately approved the social media policy we now have in place. Your story about MissMarmalade threatening to unfriend her father is hilarious.
DeleteFantastic post Terri. I never think of myself as a brand, and only put in facebook what I want the world to see, just in case.
ReplyDeleteXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Sacramento--You're NOT a brand at all and yet, you are one of the very few bloggers who conscientiously visits those who visit your blog. That is what builds real community.
DeleteI've been thinking about similar things, how social media can be pretty narcissistic. I blog, I have a FB acct. that I rarely use. That's it. I think social media is more important to younger people and definitely changing interactions for them. Not so much for people of my generation.
ReplyDeleteDarla
Darla--I know my mother loves Facebook...and she often knows things about my own children that I do NOT. I really try to allow my children to present themselves to me as they desire and try to resist any sort of lurking. Social media definitely goes hand in hand with smart phones...but I think one of the few things that keeps my life sane is not having that bit of technology.
DeleteWe've had family get-togethers where the kids sit around and relate to their phones!
DeleteTerri, you are an amazing writer and this is an excellent thought provoking post. Reading it made me realize something about myself. I have been worrying about disappointing others because I haven't been posting outfit photos of myself. You just made me realize, that is not what I should worry about. Thank you for that. I am going to change my directions and start doing what I really love--styling outfits with accessories. I don't have to be in the picture to do that. How liberating!
ReplyDeleteDebbi--Thank you. You've been on my mind this past week and I've wondered how the knee is progressing. Always, put yourself and your health FIRST. You always put accessories on my radar that I wouldn't have noticed otherwise.
DeleteVery interesting post. I'll have to read the article.
ReplyDeleteI've never heard of "Klout." It seems like a blog traffic analyzer?
I like Facebook. I keep up with the comings and goings of all kinds of people I wouldn't ever hear from if not for that forum -family/cousins and their children, old college/high school/work friends. I can imagine future novel writers hooking up with FB archives to conjure up stories the same way that people delve into old letters today.
If I were a brand I'm pretty sure I'd be bankrupt.
RoseAG--Yes, you've pegged Klout correctly. If I had kept my FB confined to family, it would have been wonderful. Fully 100 of my "friends" would have been extended family. And, yes, FB will be a goldmine for novelists! It probably already is.
DeleteLike you, as a brand, I'm already bankrupt.
Just finished that article. Offers a good explaination of why F21, H&M aren't into the endless sales/coupon business model.
DeleteDo you ever read "Penelope Trunk - the brazen careerist?" She's the epitome of this kind of self-promotion, although at this point she's doing it while home-schooling her children in Wisconsin.
I love things that have hypothetical Facebooks posts like this one. If only I could be so clever!
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/obamas_facebook_feed/2010/01/barack_obamas_facebook_feed_2.html
I will investigate this Penelope Trunk person...er, brand.
DeleteWOW! after reading all the responses, I guess we are all (to a point) a 'brand'. My brand I suppose would be thrift-store junkie. Labels have always brought out a resistant side of me, 'the man' and all...
ReplyDeleteThere are many thing I don't say or do in public (or on my blog) to create a negative image. So, to brand myself in a way, is to stifle my true self, my creativity to a point.
Great post!
Reva--When I think of you there IS an identifiable personality--you're a creative person, you're sensitive, you're vulnerable, you're a thrifter and a DIYer and a smoker. I have a sense of your soul and I don't think of you as a brand AT ALL. I agree that branding makes us smaller than we actually are. I don't want everything in my life to feel like an economic relationship.
Deletei have never really thought of myself as a brand. i mean, i have certain characteristics to describe myself, i like certain activities, but a brand...i don't know. interesting post! "I can only imagine the search profile for my ISP." made me laugh out loud!
ReplyDeleteTwoBirds--Yes, one of the reasons I like your blog is the sense that there are REAL sisters writing it. And I don't leave feeling like you are trying to sell me something.
DeleteI love your idea of doing random searches to throw off online advertising. My fella and I have been having daily email conversations with each other while we're at work via Gmail since the day of our first date, and we're constantly amused by the things Gmail advertises in response to our conversations, though a little annoyed that they seem to "eavesdrop."
ReplyDeleteWhat bothers me as much is the kinds of mailings I get in response to my shopping habits. Last year a few friends had babies at around the same time, so I kept going to Target and Old Navy to buy gifts, and consequently, am now on their "people with babies" mailing list, which is pretty annoying, but it seems there's no way off. Maybe I feel a little weird being childfree and constantly getting stuff in the mail that features pictures of kids. Couldn't they send a survey or something to ensure that this is actually relevant to me?
In any event, I don't consider myself a "brand." I do use social networking, but mainly to keep in touch with all of my long-distance family and friends. I've considered shrinking my profile a bit (i.e., removing contacts that I haven't actually seen in the past 10-15 years), but I don't think I'd remove myself all together. I try to keep topics like my job, religion and politics off of Facebook, for the sake of privacy, and on the off chance that my current (or any prospective) employer decides to look me up.
One grievance I have about social media is that it results in people oversharing. My dad and I set up a Facebook account for my mom so she could keep up with family last year. After logging in for the first time, she asked me how to block most people except for my brother and I, because she was just annoyed by a lot of the mundane updates. "Some of these people act as if they're the first person in the world to ever have a baby or raise children!" she commented, which still amuses me. But think about it, my mom being pregnant in the 70's and early 80's, and raising a family in a time before social networking, didn't feel the need to tell the entire world every detail about her pregnancies, every cute thing her kids did, every fight she had with her kids, every meal she ate, etc. She doesn't understand why people think that's necessary now, and I kind of agree with her.
Though I'm not yet "of a certain age," I can definitely understand your remark about authenticity. I think back on a lot of the fun (and stupid!) things I did when I was younger, and am so glad that no one was around capturing things like that, just to post online. Without constantly connecting online about everything, we just lived in the moment, and experienced things knowing that we wouldn't be able to keep reliving them because someone just took a bunch of pictures or a video. I feel like authenticity is pretty hard to come by on networking sites, since so many people seem to spend a lot of time crafting the perfect status update, comment, picture, etc. It's like people are living and experiencing things just for the sake of posting online about them, not just to enjoy themselves.
Anne--about the ONLY thing that the advertisements I get have right would be my age. Hope that the baby adverts don't subconciously affect your personal choices. I suppose that being towards the end of my career makes me a little less concerned about FB as a "resume"; I could honestly tell any future employer that I'm not on FB. I like your mother's sensibility and we are probably of the same generation. In some of my students' cases, I learned things via FB that would negatively affect a future reference letter. As for authenticity, by the time one is 58, one has had multiple selves and roles. I know I tell a lot of stories and it may not always add up in people's minds, but it is a result of having lived as many years as I have.
DeleteAmazingly thought-provoking post!!! I have no clue what Klout is and don't want to know.
ReplyDeleteI have a love-hate relationship with FB. I've "hidden" most of my "friends" because I'm too overwhelmed with the 300 posts a day they are doing chronicaling their every move. I don't care that you're eating a pretzel at the mall. I use it to keep up with a select few these days and I post very infrequently.
I don't twitter because I'm just too boring. I just put instagram on my phone but have no idea how to use it.
I used to have another blog that just got out of hand as i was trying to do all the right blogger stuff in growing it (it wasn't fashion/style oriented)It became too stressful and a chore. I shut it down last fall.
I blog now mostly to chronicle my evolving style and as a visual diary of what I'm wearing. I may write of some personal stuff but I'm not as driven to aquire followeres and comments. I blog for me and not the public.
menopausalsupermodel--Yeah for not knowing what Klout is! You're right that a lot of what is posted to Facebook is trivial. I would like to keep up with distant family and before I deactivated, I was probably only logging on to FB about once a week for 15 minutes. You seem very clear about your purposes...and I want to remain that way myself.
DeleteAs a fellow blogger but also someone who has not joined Facebook I too am concerned about my privacy. But back in the days of MySpace, I met many a new friend when I first moved to Portland. A digital social medium became a tangible new physical reality. I think technology is all about how you use it or abuse it.
ReplyDeleteBrand. I wanna be my own brand:)
Krista--I am all for making new friends, in part because we DO spark one another's creativity. You're a bit younger than I am so I can imagine that there is a different ethic in a different generation--a spirit of collaboration. I don't want to be a brand at all...and I think there is a danger in wanting to be, for the very reasons Miss Representation discusses.
DeleteI just wanna have fun! I'm not interested in influencing people, marketing myself or popularity contests. I blog because I love it. x
ReplyDeleteVix--I just wanna have fun too, but somehow blogging gets too easily sucked up into the "American" way. Too many are trapped into believing it's a way to make money.
DeleteI started blogging in 2004..there weren't that many free blogging sites available then, so I had to register the domain and write the HTML myself. My content was originally very topic specific, but over time I strayed from topic based content to writing regular entries about nothing in particular, and that generated a ton of interest. This was all before blog advertising, before Facebook was for anyone other than college students, before Twitter and Pinterest and Google Adsense. It was a fun creative outlet for me, and I inadvertently did create a brand, such that I would be at events and people would recognize me and say "I read your blog!" It was completely unintentional to use the blog to acquire celebrity status, but in the unique circles that I was in, that was exactly what happened. Over the years the amount of people blogging increased and the market in my field grew saturated. I never had any adverts on my blog, and I chose that deliberately. When I was approached by companies to do reviews of their products, I only did one if I liked the product. I look at fashion blogs now (my original blog was not fashion related), it's all "Follow Me on Bloglovin/Google/Facebook/Twitter". It's sick and twisted, and I feel like so many bloggers strive to brand themselves, but end up being manipulated by industries for use as free or extremely low cost advertising, and they don't even reailze it. I lost interest in blogging because it went from creative outlet to a giant popularity contest. Then the next generation showed up and everything shifted to Twitter. I currently maintain my original blog and another fashion related blog, but I seldom update because I feel like I have to compete with too many sponsored product give aways, or worse, Twitter. I am a high school teacher, so I can't even access Facebook or Twitter for at least 8 hours a day. When I come home, all the conversations happened hours ago and I am too late to the party.
ReplyDeleteKerry--Rags existed for several years in another form and had very few readers so style blogging was quite a revelation to me. Like you found, the "nothing in particular" topics often get the most attention--because readers want to know that the voice of the blogger is REAL. I've been thinking about this word "brand" all day and I'm starting to think that maybe it only means what "style" in the broader sense used to mean--that there is something characteristic about you do in any endeavor whether it is getting dressed in the morning or writing or snapping a photograph. One of the reasons I wrote this post is that I am so often approached my advertisers but feel conflicted about it and except with one case, I have turned them all down. I don't want to work for free!!! I don't want to compete either. I can at least access Twitter (and even Facebook) on my campus, but I don't.
DeleteOh, Terri--these are the hard questions, aren't they?
ReplyDeleteWhen I started The Beheld I understood that if I wanted to get readers, I would have to do some limited amount of "branding." I blog for myself, yes, but I'm also blogging as a part of my professional platform (writing), so I couldn't just cross my fingers and hope that it would be read. I'm FAR from expert, but I created certain things (my icon, for example) to help with that branding, and I have mixed feelings about it. For on one hand, I'm insistent that The Beheld is a separate entity from Autumn; my social media is almost all The Beheld, very little Autumn. But of course, it's not that simple; I do strive for honesty (I hesitate to say authenticity, because who even knows what that means?) and my voice on my blog is much like how I wrote when I had a largely locked Livejournal that wasn't about "branding" in the least. It's a constant struggle to walk that line between speaking in one's own voice and consciously speaking in one's own "voice," if that makes sense. I'd be foolish to say I kept my blog and my life separate; I'd be foolish to say I'm "just being me" on it as well.
I remember my mother being, in my mind, paranoid about companies tracking her information--she wouldn't sign up for grocery/drugstore rewards programs, for example, because she didn't want any data collected on her. At the time (the early '90s) I thought she was being paranoid, and I remember repeatedly thinking, "Well, you're just buying groceries, it's not like you're doing anything wrong so who cares who knows?" That was literally a childish way of thinking; I was thinking of surveillance as being "caught." I didn't yet understand what privacy actually meant.
And glad you liked the n+1 article! Andrew Potter has an interesting book called "The Authenticity Hoax" that deals with this, though more on the corporate end than the personal/social media end.
Autumn--I think I do understand the difference between a professional voice and a personal voice. I practice that all the time in the classroom...but I suspect that the little bits of the personal I bring into the classroom is one reason that students find me to be a refreshing instructor.
DeleteI like your mother's paranoia. I know that I have been purchasing books with CASH since 9/11. The Patriot Act means that the Department of Homeland Security could conceivably subpoena even my library records...and none of the librarians on my campus could breathe a word of that to me, even though they are my friends. I am very cautious about somethings--in part because the political situation in our country changes every 4 years.
I may have to track down that book. Thank you for the recommendation.
This is when I wish we could speak and not type. I could go on and on. I have a presciently clear idea of branding before it was a soundbite. I get it- maybe its the poet mind (or my idiot savant attack on low-fi marketing) but I GET branding. Not style, but style is part of it.
ReplyDeleteThink Tiffany's. Coca-Cola. Apple. Hermes. Vercace. Prada. They have success rooted deeply in their branding.
They offer the client a piece of what Tiffany's/Coke/Apple/Hermes represents, not just the products, not merely the goods but the EXPERIENCE OF what the product represents. They charge for it. They profit because of it.
Personal branding the buzzword of 2012 makes sense in the Warholian era of 15 minute fame. Fashiontoast. Glamourai. Style Rookie. Sea of Shoes. Advanced Style. All blogs, and also BRANDS. Because, I the reader can "buy" into the experience of Rumi, Kelly, Tavi and whatsherface. And Ari and those incredible women of sterling stellar style. I by association can feel edgy/sexy, modern glamourous, precious indie, fashionable, and cultivated all by associating myself with those blogs. And the brand gets its "street cred" by an authentic sounding voice/face.
Rags could easily become a brand. But is it?
I wish we had a six pack and a porch and some vis-a-vis, and we could discuss it.
Bella--Would love to polish off a six-pack with you! I "get" what branding is...but the person I am is largely available to whomever wishes to be. It is not something I offer for sale, though I did purchase the Advanced Style book and just made a Kickstarter contribution so Ari's "branding" is definitely working!!
DeleteI think I begin to see the possibilities of branding...advertisers approach me pretty regularly without much effort on my part. But, I am frequently conflicted about it and in all but one case, I have turned it down.
I spent years fearing being "out" online. Identity theft is such a scary thing in today's world. I didn't really think to brand myself, and used to sign up with all the sites. I still probably show up on google under my old usernames and there's probably not as much privatized information as I wish taken care of. I currently still have my facebook, though I rarely use it and only ever read it on my phone. I use twitter for keeping in touch with readers, friends, family and as a quick means of communication outside emails and my blog. Public conversation if you will. I have FB, twitter, my blog, a livejournal (community use only these days), google+, and a linkedin.
ReplyDeleteI have closed all three of my deviantart accounts because I did not find the site as useful as it once was. I closed my Pinterest account around the time it started exploding. I decided I didn't want to deal with their sketchy terms of service, and it turned out to be a good decision, because I no longer waste that time on pinning photos of stuff I'm never going to make or do. I'm doing stuff instead.
Which brings me to personal branding. I like to believe if I, personally, market myself and my skills, appeal to a reader and customer base then I can bring myself credibility in a way that "in real life" connections are nigh impossible to replicate. I blog because I feel like I have ideas and products that people want, and if I want to get that out there, I should hold myself, my name and my "brand" to that. I don't go out and comment spam to get people to read. I make sure my content is valid. I make personal connections, get personal feedback/stories on things I create, and make sure it's something people not only want, but want their friends to know about too.
Creating an authentic experience is a hard concept to approach. Yes, we all strive for that, but how does a blogger's voice change when it becomes about reviewing a sponsored item? Or a company that's paying them for their words. I choose not to giveaway items that come from outside sources, I don't accept ad-space or paid posts. I freely admit this on my blog.
However some bloggers feel differently than I do, and choose that way to make their money or at least support their blog online. And that's okay. I think they can maintain a personal authenticity through their Voice, but we as readers/consumers must also realize the influences behind that.
Trying to come full circle with this comment - I'd like to continue to minimize my online "spread" over time, and begin focusing on my blog, my projects, and yes, my personal brand. I don't think it's necessary to have an account across everything to promote oneself.
MeganMae--I think I am reluctant to accept advertising because I highly value the freedom I have to speak out on any issue. I like how you describe things in your third paragraph. I don't mind others making money from their blogs, but I tend to skip those posts that contain some sort of advertising. I value community instead. It troubles me that some businesses would like to "use" my community.
DeleteI saw stuff from Klout in my twitter newsfeed a while back and remember wondering WTF but I was never drawn to check it out. With Pinterest I signed up early on (maybe a year ago, I think it was for that 30DaysOfCreativity thing). I pinned a grand total of my 7 creative days and then lost interest in both efforts. As for a "brand" a while I ago I made an effort to design an owl background and avatar that I use across etsy, twitter and my blog. Plus I have little business cards and coupon stickers in the same style that I send out with my etsy orders. I do a little self promotion of my etsy on my blog and twitter but that is as far as I go as far as branding myself.
ReplyDeleteI recently deactivated my Facebook account and I still get an urge to log back in every once in a while. Sidenote: I find it crazy that you can deactivate it but not really delete it without filling out some kind of request form. Anyway, I only ever tried rolling my "brand" into facebook early on. But mostly I used it more for personal connections and I stopped linking up to my blog/etsy over there. I just felt the Aunt I hardly ever see and old high school friends didn't care you know? I didn't want to look obnoxious, which I think can happen to even lowkey online personas such as myself, i.e. when many of your friends and family are not as tech / social network savvy...
So I guess I've gone through phases of signing up for everything as "madam0wl" thinking to build my identity or whatever, but now I'm gradually pulling everything back in. I think for me it is mostly from online burnout, but I also it stems from an inner urge to be less obnoxious / more authentic / more mysterious, not spread so thin. Because wouldn't the most authentic thing be to not have an online presence at all? Otherwise you are just "pandering to the digital" which is a little phrase a friend of mine used once when giving me shit, but it really stuck.
Right now I'm really only doing Twitter and my blog. I'd like to use Google+ in place of facebook, but I think it is going to take a while before people migrate over that way.
Sandra--I do have business cards. In fact, the last set was one I got for free as a Klout perk! I would really like to delete my Facebook and had not known about this form you mention. I like what you write about "mystique" and even when I write a post I don't do an info dump on everything I know. I like to keep something in reserve.
DeleteI keep trying to figure out Google+ but haven't had a lot of luck.
An interesting post. I have to be careful as I spent 3 years owkring in a men's prison and now work with 16-19 year olds. I have made such wonderful contacts through social media that I would hate to give it u altogether.
ReplyDeleteJane--I'm not considering giving up all social media, but I want to be more intelligent and purposeful about it.
DeleteHmmm makes you think...the whole branding of oneself.
ReplyDeleteLila--It may be a generational thing...I have a reputation, but don't think of myself as a "brand."
DeleteFor better or worse, my brain is reeling. I'm not on Facebook, don't use Twitter, and I blog just for fun. (I like to write and I like clothes). I almost never watch TV, I'll listen to a few shows on NPR, and I like to read books. I learned how to text about a year ago because I decided that I'd look old if I didn't know how. All these facts are just the result of my techno laziness, not any indictment necessarily on the things themselves. (I take that back-I hate TV)
ReplyDeleteIronically, in my work as a voice talent I sell whatever I'm hired to sell, whether it's cars or a hospital system (or a university!). My voice becomes part of their brand. Sometimes the products are good and sometimes not. So I'm reminded daily that brands aren't always what they seem. I like to think I can escape that commodification mentality when I create clothes or write, but that may not be the case.
In any event, I realize as I read this post that that elusive thing, authenticity, is worth searching for, digging (and digging your heels in) for. Someday we need to have that front porch/pitcher of beer/glass of wine gathering, like Bella mentioned. There's so much to say and think about, and I can't type! Thanks for this post.
Jean--We own a television, but I never watch it. We purchased a large screen thinking that in our dotage we could hook our laptops to it and still be able to read. We're trying to think ahead!
DeleteI think you've successfully avoided commodification on your blog. I take you at face value there. What an interesting way to earn a living, as a "voice."
I would join you for a glass of wine!
Interesting post Terri. I'm going to write to you privately about it via email :).
ReplyDeleteSusan--I enjoyed our e-mail exchange.
Deletethis is really interesting. i honestly don't think about it too much, though i probably should. i do get a little nervous that i have pics of my kids up sometimes. but i am terrible about actually posting on facebook. and i've never really thought of myself as a brand. hmm...
ReplyDeletehttp://spinning-threads.blogspot.com
Claire--I stopped using photos of my adult daughters on Rags because of some "nasty" searches that came my way and some unfortunate word choices on my part. I love the photos of your children and in some ways, the pet names you've come up with for them does protect their identity.
Deleteyou raise some important ideas about how much information we give out and how much of that is being collected and stored and thrown back at us.
ReplyDeleteI generally try to be authentic on my blog, but I still only put forth that which I want people to see; I don't really ever talk about my job, sometimes I mention my family, but mostly I just talk clothes and other bloggers. In the most authentic way I know how.
Lyddie--I have wondered what kind of work you do. Does your workplace have a social media policy? And are they aware of your blog?
DeleteI try to be as authentic as possible. I'm a totally awkward spaz, and I think I portray that well on my blog. I don't like pretending to be someone that I am not.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.glamkittenslitterbox.com/
Twitter: @GlamKitten88
Bonnie--Hm, I may have to investigate your authentic awkwardness!
DeleteGood question. I've written about this several times, on the blog. I wish I could find a comment-sized response that was worthy of contributing here. Let's just say that I feel our construct of identity is undergoing a shift we have not yet fully felt, nor understood. Have a good weekend:).
ReplyDeleteLPC--It IS undergoing a shift and it makes me uneasy, perhaps because I can remember a different way of relating to others.
DeleteTerri, as always you make me think! I hadn't thought of myself as a 'brand.' I hear this all the time now, and it was a concept that was discussed in the health care industry before I left what was a huge part of my identity for so many years. I use facebook, mostly to follow friends, and I have a Style Crone page, which contains my blog posts. I have not been part of Klout or Pinterest. I'm on Twitter, and for awhile I was enamored with its scope. But now I have become relatively inactive. I haven't accepted advertising, but understand when others do. Basically, I don't know where I'm going and just keep on blogging because it has become an important part of my life and provides structure, focus and community. And a forum for creative self expression.
ReplyDeleteRight now I've been exploring new blogs; I have a great deal of curiosity about the range and diversity that exists in this world. I feel that I'm 'waking up' but without a plan. I really don't know what all of this means, as I'm in transition. But you have provided food for thought, and I'm sure it will rumble around in my brain for some time.
Judith--It sounds to me like you are using social media responsibly and in a way that enhances your blog. I agree that to begin to advertise on a blog changes the game and affects relationships with readers. That's what I don't want to loose. I like your explorations of new blogs...as it always leads me to blogs I like.
DeleteI'm late to the conversation but it's an interesting one.
ReplyDeleteIf we're not being authentic, what's the point? Life's too short for artifice. There's enough insincerity already in modern society.
And a "brand"? Only if you're selling something. For personal use of social media, that's a category-error. Sadly, a common one created by our celebrity-culture.
Ally--Authenticity is a higher value to me than having an effective brand, but then I may be lucky in that I'm not trying to make any money with Rags.
DeleteI love this type of post.
ReplyDeleteI think if you dont have something, you really need not worry about it. For example, Klout :)
I have FB but closed my account about 3 months ago and then went back on it recently.
However, I don't log in everyday as I use to...
I have Twitter and Tweet about twice a day but do it on my spare time, like in traffic waiting for the light to turn green or at the doctor's waiting room. It's not like I sit down to tweet.
I love pinterest and keep a few folders but am not that committed.
Another thing is I do not CONNECT accounts.
In my case privacy is a big issue - due to crime - here they'll kidnap you for a thousand dollars so you've got to keep a low profile. This is one of the reasons I do not have they country I blog from in my blog profile.
Lorena--I have tried to be a bit cryptic about my location in my profile, but anyone who reads regularly could learn a lot about me. I have made the mistake of connecting several of my social media accounts.
DeleteHi to every , since I am in fact eager of reading
ReplyDeletethis blog's post to be updated daily. It carries nice stuff.
Look into my website: 8mr